Where does radeon x1300 pro 256 mb agp card stand within comparison to cards close to 7300 gt and 6800.?

Where does radeon x1300 pro 256 mb agp card stand within comparison to cards close to 7300 gt and 6800.?

The X1300 is a lower-end card than the other two- if you look at any overall roundup of video cards, the X1300 is never discussed, it's below the cutoff point for gamers.



Keep surrounded by mind that ATI's X1950 line competes against Nvidia's 7900 series (and the matchups verbs down the line) but you almost never get below the X1650.



As the previous poster mentioned, Tom's hardware is a great resource for reviews of video cards, but the best resource to compare them head-to-head is http://www.gpureview.com



Below I've connected direct comparisons of the cards you mentioned (as you can see, the X1300 doesn't even compare well to the cheaper GS models, permit alone the GT's) and included the best video cards for the money list from Tom's hardware. Good luck!
I other check out Tom's hardware. Look at your budget, look and the site, purchase it at http://www.newegg.com. If you have any trouble they will fix it!

http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/05/01/t...

Good luck.
The X1300 Pro is a pretty briskly budget card. It has 600mhz core clock and 800mhz memclock. BUT it have ONLY 4 pixel pipelines.

http://www.neoseeker.com/articles/hardwa...

There is now means of access it could catch up w/ a 7300GT ddr3 (500/1400mhz, 8pipes) or a 6800 (325/700mhz/256bit,12pipes).

good property for sale